Acti vs Gboard: Agentic Keyboard vs AI Keyboard

Acti is an emerging agentic keyboard that executes cross-app tasks from the keyboard. Gboard is Google's mature AI keyboard focused on text prediction, swipe typing, and search integration. They represent two different philosophies of what a smart keyboard should do. Here's how they actually compare.

Acti

The clearest early example of an agentic keyboard. Executes search, booking, and sharing actions from the keyboard instead of just improving text. iOS-only, early-stage, evolving rapidly.

Full review

Gboard with Gemini

Google's mature AI keyboard with predictions, swipe typing, voice input, multilingual support, and Gemini-powered assistance where available. Best on Android.

Full review

Side-by-Side Comparison

Category
Acti

Agentic keyboard (emerging)

Gboard

AI keyboard with Google ecosystem features

Core function
Acti

Executes cross-app tasks — search, book, share, compose

Gboard

Improves typing — predictions, swipe, search, voice input

Platforms
Acti

iOS only

Gboard

Android (best), iOS

Maturity
Acti

Early-stage, features evolving rapidly

Gboard

Mature, widely used Google keyboard

Search
Acti

Web search from the keyboard with action-oriented results

Gboard

Google Search from keyboard with Gemini integration where available

Text prediction
Acti

Context-aware suggestions tied to actions, not just next-word

Gboard

ML-powered next-word prediction, swipe typing, multilingual

Voice input
Acti

Not a primary focus

Gboard

Google voice typing features where available

Multilingual
Acti

More limited during early rollout

Gboard

Broad multilingual support with language switching

Writing polish
Acti

Not designed for grammar or tone improvement

Gboard

Writing suggestions and proofreading where available

Ecosystem
Acti

Standalone emerging product

Gboard

Deep Google ecosystem — Search, Maps, Gmail, YouTube

Privacy model
Acti

Requires Full Access and broader permissions for agentic features

Gboard

On-device and cloud options; incognito mode available

Agentic potential
Acti

Already executes tasks — the clearest agentic keyboard example

Gboard

Search and predictions are building blocks, but not fully agentic

Head-to-Head: Common Tasks

Which keyboard fits better for everyday tasks? Here is a practical breakdown.

Booking a restaurant while textingBetter: Acti
Acti

Acti is built for this — search and book from the keyboard without leaving the chat.

Gboard

Gboard can search Google, but you switch to a browser or app to complete the booking.

Caveat: Acti's booking integrations may be limited by region and partner availability during early rollout.

Fast swipe typingBetter: Gboard
Acti

Acti focuses on actions, not swipe typing. Text entry is functional but basic.

Gboard

Well-refined swipe typing and autocorrect, especially on Android.

Caveat: If you swipe-type most of the time, Gboard is the better daily driver.

Writing a polished work emailBetter: Gboard
Acti

Acti does not offer grammar checking or tone adjustment.

Gboard

Writing suggestions and proofreading where available. For dedicated writing polish, Grammarly Keyboard is stronger.

Caveat: Neither keyboard is primarily a writing assistant. Grammarly Keyboard is the better tool for writing quality.

Multilingual typingBetter: Gboard
Acti

More limited language support during early rollout.

Gboard

Broad multilingual support, language switching, and Google Translate integration where available.

Caveat: Acti may add more languages over time, but Gboard has a years-long head start.

Voice dictationBetter: Gboard
Acti

Voice input is not a core focus for Acti.

Gboard

Google voice typing is mature and useful where supported.

Caveat: For dedicated voice dictation, Wispr Flow is purpose-built and may be a better fit than either.

Reducing app-switchingBetter: Acti
Acti

Core value proposition — execute actions inline without leaving your current app.

Gboard

Google Search from the keyboard saves some switching, but you still leave for most task completion.

Caveat: Acti's action coverage is growing but not universal. Not every workflow is supported yet.

Privacy and permissionsBetter: Gboard
Acti

Requires Full Access, calendar, contacts, and location for full agentic functionality.

Gboard

On-device processing for basic features; incognito mode available. Fewer permissions needed.

Caveat: Agentic features inherently require more permissions. The trade-off is between capability and privacy comfort.

Feature availability varies by platform, region, and rollout stage. Both products are updated frequently. Check the current app listing for the latest capabilities in your area.

Verdict by User Type

You want to reduce app-switchingActi

Acti is built for this. Execute search, booking, and sharing actions without leaving your current app. The clearest agentic keyboard available.

You want fast, accurate typingGboard

Years of swipe typing, prediction, and autocorrect refinement. If typing speed and accuracy are your priority, Gboard is the better daily driver.

Android userGboard

Our current listing tracks Acti as iOS-only. Gboard is the more practical choice for Android users.

iPhone user curious about agentic keyboardsActi

Acti is the best way to experience agentic keyboard capabilities on iOS today. Keep Gboard or your default keyboard for general typing.

Multilingual typistGboard

Gboard has broad multilingual support and language switching. Acti's language support is more limited during early rollout.

Privacy-conscious userGboard

Gboard requires fewer permissions and offers incognito mode. Acti needs broader permissions for its agentic features — a direct trade-off between capability and privacy.

You want both action + typingUse both

Many early Acti users keep Gboard for daily typing and activate Acti when they need to execute tasks. The two keyboards complement each other.

Agentic Keyboard vs AI Keyboard

This comparison reflects a broader distinction in the keyboard market. Acti is an agentic keyboard — it executes tasks. Gboard is an AI keyboard — it improves typing. See our full guide to agentic vs AI keyboards and our best agentic keyboard apps.

Frequently Asked Questions

They serve different purposes. Acti is better if you want a keyboard that can execute tasks — search, book, share — without leaving your current app. Gboard is better if you want fast, accurate typing with swipe, predictions, multilingual support, and Google ecosystem integration. Acti is an agentic keyboard; Gboard is an AI keyboard. The right choice depends on whether you prioritize task execution or typing refinement.
For most people, not yet. Acti is an early-stage product that excels at action execution but lacks Gboard's typing refinement — swipe typing, multilingual prediction, and years of autocorrect tuning. Many early Acti users keep Gboard or another keyboard as their primary typing keyboard and switch to Acti for action-oriented workflows. As Acti matures, it may become a full replacement for some users.
Our current listing tracks Acti as iOS-only. Check Acti's official site or app listing for the latest platform availability. Gboard is available on both Android and iOS, though the Android version generally has a richer feature set.
No. Gboard is an AI keyboard — it improves typing through predictions, swipe, voice input, and search integration. It does not execute cross-app actions like booking, sharing locations, or running multi-app workflows. Acti is one of the few keyboards purpose-built for task execution from the keyboard.
Gboard requires fewer permissions and offers incognito mode, making it the more privacy-conservative choice. Acti requires broader permissions (Full Access, calendar, contacts, location) to enable its agentic features. The trade-off is direct: more capability means more data access. Choose based on your comfort level with keyboard permissions.
Gboard is free to install. For Acti, check the official site or App Store listing for current pricing and availability. Pricing and availability can change over time.